Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

Xiaomi 13 Pro.

Xiaomi 13T Pro. Summary Scores Specifications Video. Pros Good photo and video performance in outdoor settings Screen with good color rendering in most light conditions Smooth screen interactions in most use-cases Overall good experience when watching HDR10 videos Very few audio artifacts noticed with the built-in speakers Excellent loudness of the recordings Excellent charging experience and boost charging capabilities thanks to optimal charge efficiency. Cons Slightly inaccurate skin-color renderings in images Lack of zero shutter lag in camera Screen lacks details under sunlight Visible aliasing when playing video games Frame mismatches when watching videos and playing video games Sound rendition from the built-in speakers is a bit harsh Poor stereo rendition with the built-in speakers Poor efficiency in terms of discharge currents. Overall Camera Score i. Photo i.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Brightness adaptation was good in most conditions except indoors, where brightness was lower than its competitors. Screen readability diminished when the device was used under sunlight as details were lost, especially in dark areas. Both contrast and colors were well-managed on the device, particularly when watching HDR10 video content. But brightness adaptation to HDR10 content was low, compared with the adaptation of other devices, which feature 10 nits to 15 nits of more brightness. Xiaomi 13 Pro users might need to calibrate the brightness to get a more satisfying HDR10 rendering. When it comes to the video game experience, the device showed no frame mismatches, but ghost touches were frequent. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display. Color Xiaomi 13 Pro.

Efficiency i. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Main photo artifacts penalties.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. The camera benefitted especially from its remarkable results in the zoom category.

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. With an overall Camera score of , the Xiaomi 13T Pro ranked 8 points higher than the Xiaomi 13T, even though both phones are equipped with the same camera hardware. The differences in image quality were particularly visible in color rendering , in terms of white balance and skin tone rendering. This year, Xiaomi has shifted gears and equipped the 13T and 13T Pro lines with a Mediatek chipset, after several years of using Qualcomm chipsets for the T Pro lines. When compared with the 12T Pro, its predecessor, the 13T Pro also scored a few points higher in camera performance, thanks mostly to the photo rendering in which exposure, and especially noise and autofocus, showed significant improvements. The autofocus was generally spot on, and the 13T Pro managed to keep the main subject sharp.

Xiaomi 13 pro dxomark

This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data. Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score. Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations. In addition, the camera was capable of producing high image quality at close and medium range tele settings and recorded still images with a wide dynamic range, even in low light. The 13 Pro camera has some similar hardware to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, but there are a few differences to note. Both models have Leica-branded lens and the Leica color modes.

Goblin cast

Xiaomi 13 Pro — Pleasant color, accurate white balance. Gaming Through the smartphone's integrated speakers. Xiaomi 13 Pro — Unnatural blur gradient on the tree, segmentation errors between the face and hair of the model. Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions. The second tele camera helped improve detail significantly over the 13 Pro. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. Xiaomi 13 Pro - Loss of fine detail. Asus Zenfone 8. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra applied strong skin smoothening to subjects in bokeh mode unlike with the photo mode. Apple iPhone 15 Plus.

Xiaomi may be known mostly for its excellent budget phones , and while these may make up the biggest portion of the company's revenue, the brand has also been offering enticing high-end flagships for a while now.

In addition, video noise was slightly more intrusive in bright light compared to other competitors, and stabilization was inconsistent. Summary Scores Specifications. Google Pixel 6a. Huawei P60 Pro. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. Color Xiaomi 13 Pro. Xiaomi 12T Pro — Good stability and slight highlights clipping. Pros Very consistent image quality on all the zoom range Pleasant and neutral white balance in photo and video Fairly wide dynamic range in photo Fairly good texture - noise trade-off in most test conditions Smooth and accurate video autofocus Good face exposure, even in very dark night shots. Google Pixel 7a.