Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
This has been a very welcome addition to the market, because the Nikkor had been alone price-wise, and third-party options were not up to the standards.
Riding above the typical mm focal length range found in kit and general purpose lenses, the mm or similar focal length range is extremely popular - easily covering the range I typically recommend to someone interested in a second lens. Note: I don't consider the gap between 55mm and 70mm to be significant. Either way, the difference between 70mm and mm is obvious. And the overall range is useful. Generating a list of uses for a mm lens is a daunting task it includes family life, vacations, landscapes, travel, wildlife , but the relatively narrow aperture typically found in this class of lens removes low light action from its uses list.
Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
In August of Tamron released an updated version of its mm telephoto zoom lens, with a few notable improvements. The first and most obvious is the addition of Vibration Control VC technology, to reduce the effect of camera shake and provide sharper images. The lens appears to be completely redesigned, with 4 additional lens elements and a new autofocus system. The lens was designed to fit full-frame film and digital SLR cameras, and on APS-C digital cameras, provides an equivalent field of view of mm Canon or mm Nikon and others. This lens isn't a "constant" lens, in that as you increase the focal length, both the maximum and minimum aperture sizes decrease. The following table reflects the change in apertures as you zoom the lens:. Sharpness With the lens mounted on the sub-frame Canon 7D, the lens produced some exceptionally sharp images, more towards the ''wider'' end of 70mm than when zoomed in fully to mm. Mounted on the full-frame Canon 1Ds Mark III, the lens doesn't betray any secrets - it's just a little bit softer at wide apertures. CA is more noticeable as the lens is stopped down, offering the best performance at mm and mm. Shading ''Vignetting'' Corner shading is virtually non-existent when the lens is mounted on the sub-frame 7D. On the 1Ds Mark III however, it's a different story: you have to stop down significantly to get images which don't show some kind of light falloff in the corners. At its worst, you're looking at extreme corners which are almost a full stop darker than the center - you see this at mm and mm when used wide open.
However the new lens offers improved CA tolerance, and less corner shading, as well as the obvious benefits of USD focusing and Vibration Control. The bokeh from this lens is perfectly circular at the center and suffers from the cats eye distortion due to vignetting in the corners and more so in the extremes. Tamron 70 300 vc portrait totally recommend this lens!
Yes i'm curious about it too. But i'm concerned it might still be too bulky for me despite being the most compact lens of its kind. Nonetheless it looks very interesting. Best regards, Mic. Hi Mic, it's amazing how much sharp this lens is! Which camera have you used here?
In August of Tamron released an updated version of its mm telephoto zoom lens, with a few notable improvements. The first and most obvious is the addition of Vibration Control VC technology, to reduce the effect of camera shake and provide sharper images. The lens appears to be completely redesigned, with 4 additional lens elements and a new autofocus system. The lens was designed to fit full-frame film and digital SLR cameras, and on APS-C digital cameras, provides an equivalent field of view of mm Canon or mm Nikon and others. This lens isn't a "constant" lens, in that as you increase the focal length, both the maximum and minimum aperture sizes decrease. The following table reflects the change in apertures as you zoom the lens:.
Tamron 70 300 vc portrait
Riding above the typical mm focal length range found in kit and general purpose lenses, the mm or similar focal length range is extremely popular - easily covering the range I typically recommend to someone interested in a second lens. Note: I don't consider the gap between 55mm and 70mm to be significant. Either way, the difference between 70mm and mm is obvious. And the overall range is useful. Generating a list of uses for a mm lens is a daunting task it includes family life, vacations, landscapes, travel, wildlife , but the relatively narrow aperture typically found in this class of lens removes low light action from its uses list. Here is a comparison of the aperture step down between the Tamron and some Canon telephoto lens models. Aside from being narrow at the long end, the 's variable max aperture means that manual exposures utilizing a wide open aperture will not stay consistent over the focal length range. Again, this attribute is shared by all lenses in this class. The VC on this lens causes the image in the viewfinder to jump when it activates.
Fondos de perfil sad
The performance of the Tamrom wide open was just great. For the ''VFA'' target the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource , we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. Of course, the image gets a little soft at mm but within the acceptable range. This will be more visibly explained below in the vignetting test. I paired it with my Nikon D and it's a marriage made in heaven! Corner sharpness is almost the same as the center. A case is not included with this lens. I find image stabilization to be incredibly useful. The Canon's advantages include modestly lighter weight, better AF accuracy, less vignetting and less pincushion distortion through mm. Aberrations are negligible at almost every aperture, except at its maximum where minor vestiges can be found on extremely high contrast situations, but only at the widest focal length. The Tamron performs very impressively well for it's price point. The image quality is good all the away I would say. To look at these two lenses I tried several techniques but basically it boils down to taking lots and lots of shots at various shutter speeds with each lens and then looking at all the images and coming up with some sort of statistical assessment of sharpness. Please share this page! It outperforms the Nikkor VR much.
Tamron has been on a tear in the last few years on the Sony FE full frame E-mount platform, releasing one high-performing, reasonably priced zoom after another. This started with the very well received mm F2. Thus far Tamron has followed a fairly fixed formula: their zoom lenses on Sony all have weather sealing, good but not exceptional builds, outstanding autofocus capabilities, a universal 67mm filter thread, no switches on the barrel, and no VC Vibration Compensation, their name for an optical image stabilizer.
It does offer SSM focusing. Either Canon or Nikon mount you have, this will be a very good lens to have in your bag! Making pictures is good when its focus right, but a sharp lens does not deliver sharp subjects if not focused accurately. But when a budget-priced lens shows great performance, it's harder to shower praise upon it because lens snobs who've invested thousands of dollars on their lenses would be so ready to heckle and criticize you. Some shots are focused accurately while backfocusing occurs as frequently as frontfocusing. I actually view this as a positive attribute as it forces proper use of hood I see hoods used in reverse position FAR too often. There are many mm or similar lenses available. It doesn't guarantee it. Tamron's published MTF data is shown below: Image Stabilization Image stabilization is always difficult to test in any quantitative fashion. We haven't had an opportunity yet to test this lens on a full-frame body. We spent 2 hours in the store making detailed comparisons using my MacBook with 2 other guys in the shop offering very valued, experienced but un-biased opinion including making crops of each image. As you would expect, this huge improvement in image quality, along with better build quality and much better autofocus performance, comes at a price. Can you help right now?
Nice phrase
I confirm. It was and with me. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.