Nikon d600 review

Supporting the Nikon F-mount on the Internet since

Ming Thein Photographer. Some cameras launch with a huge amount of anticipation and fanfare, some are surprises from far left field, and some are simply such poorly kept secrets that the manufacturer might as well just have skipped the announcement. Although the Nikon D falls squarely into the last category, I think photographers in the world were pleased when it finally broke official cover. Not quite what you expected me to say in the first paragraph, I bet. The older model continued in the lineup together with the higher spec and higher priced D pair. At this point, however, the technology inside the D was five years old — an age in the digital world, and possibly the oldest sensor architecture still purchasable new with the exception of the Leica M9, whose photosite design was inherited from the M8. Awaiting departure.

Nikon d600 review

Other highlights include a shutter unit designed for , actuations, an ISO range of , extendible up to 25, and down to 50; dual SD card slots with SDXC and UHS-I support; a dual-axis virtual horizon; in camera HDR exposure blending; and Full HD video capture at a variety of frame rates, with the ability to output an uncompressed live video stream to external recorders. That's right - for a little more than a third of the price of a D3X, you can now purchase a camera with a similarly sized sensor and practically identical pixel count. And while it's obviously not in the same league in terms of overall build quality, ruggedness and durability, the Nikon D can certainly hold its own when it comes to cutting-edge features and technologies, some of which were practically unheard of when the D3X was released back in The lower weight has mainly to do with the body material - the Nikon D has a body shell whose rear and top plates are made of metal but the front plate is plastic. That doesn't make it any less sturdy - in fact, the D boasts the exact same level of weatherproofing as the D The right-hand grip is smaller but still quite comfortable, even if using the camera for an extended period of time. As far as its control layout is concerned, the Nikon D takes its cues from the D and D - but doesn't quite duplicate either of them. Most Nikon users will feel right at home with the D, but make no mistake - for all the similarities with the other models, its control arrangement is still unique; more like a blend of the D's and the D's than a duplicate of either. Given that many prospective owners will use it either as a step-up or a back-up body, it would have been logical for Nikon to take the user interface of an existing model and replicate it on the D as closely as possible, but this is not quite the case. But if you plan on using the two cameras alongside each other, that's a different story. The same goes for using the D as a back-up to a D - the interface differences make it difficult to seamlessly switch back and forth between the two cameras. We suspect Nikon did this for a reason - namely, to make D owners who need a second body buy another D rather than the cheaper D Like the D but unlike the D, the Nikon D features a mode dial, located on the left shoulder of the camera body when viewed from behind.

There were occasions when the camera hunted for focus, but only nikon d600 review situations where the Nikon D would also hunt for focus, such as in dark rooms. March 28, at PM.

This D review offers real world comparison photos from Nikon D and D and D, the two cameras to which the Nikon D has been sometimes pejoratively compared. As I presently own all three cameras, I thought these controlled tests in addition to my commentary about the Nikon D after using a variety of Nikon cameras over the years, would provide readers with relevant information to make an informed decision as to whether the D would be a worthwhile upgrade from the D or D Read my new Nikon D Review on my new travel photography website. Obviously whether the D is for you is a personal decision, but rather than being anti-climactic with this review, my answer to the question of whether this camera is a worthwhile upgrade is an emphatic YES! The initial reaction to the Nikon D upon its announcement but before anyone had actually used it was quite polarized. It seems that regular readers of sites like NikonRumors. Interestingly, I speculate that price is the commonality between these two groups.

Other highlights include a shutter unit designed for , actuations, an ISO range of , extendible up to 25, and down to 50; dual SD card slots with SDXC and UHS-I support; a dual-axis virtual horizon; in camera HDR exposure blending; and Full HD video capture at a variety of frame rates, with the ability to output an uncompressed live video stream to external recorders. That's right - for a little more than a third of the price of a D3X, you can now purchase a camera with a similarly sized sensor and practically identical pixel count. And while it's obviously not in the same league in terms of overall build quality, ruggedness and durability, the Nikon D can certainly hold its own when it comes to cutting-edge features and technologies, some of which were practically unheard of when the D3X was released back in The lower weight has mainly to do with the body material - the Nikon D has a body shell whose rear and top plates are made of metal but the front plate is plastic. That doesn't make it any less sturdy - in fact, the D boasts the exact same level of weatherproofing as the D The right-hand grip is smaller but still quite comfortable, even if using the camera for an extended period of time.

Nikon d600 review

Our expert, award-winning staff selects the products we cover and rigorously researches and tests our top picks. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Reviews ethics statement. There's a lot to love about the company's "budget" full-frame camera. Inexpensive -- well, it's all relative -- smartly designed, fast, and with generally excellent photo quality, the Nikon D lives up to the buzz it generated from its first days as a baby rumor. Image quality With one disappointing exception, the D delivers terrific photo quality for the price. I start to see a little degradation in shadow areas at ISO , though there's no corresponding degradation in well-lit areas until about ISO JPEG images are generally quite usable through ISO ; depending upon the scene and lighting you can probably push it as high as ISO , though I'd recommend working with raw to be on the safe side. Like most full-frame cameras, the D produces photos with a nice, natural sharpness and tonality. It renders a broad dynamic range, although disappointingly there's a lot less recoverable detail in clipped highlights,even in bit raw files, than with more expensive models like the 5D Mark III and D it will be interesting to see how the Canon EOS 6D fares under similar circumstances.

59mm in inches

They're right. We can completely equalize things by first downsizing the 24mp image to 12mp, thus masking per-pixel noise, but I don't think we have to go that far for most people because they're simply not printing large enough to produce a visible difference in the first place. Enter the D The JPEG image did turn out to have some blown highlights, though much less than we'd expected. Ivan Muller says:. Stormchild says:. Its large 24 megapixels CMOS sensor is capable of shooting continuously at 5. Your browser does not support iFrame. I looked at the reviews, including this one, of course, and the one nagging thing about it is something to do with the oil splatters from the mirror motor or something along those lines. Return to top of page. Why can't I find your works in the Kindle Nook store? We then opened the raw file in Nikon View NX 2. If so, it's probably a safe unit to buy. Likewise, shadow detail is greater than both cameras as well. I do print large prints poster size for some, and sometimes on Duratrans , so more pixels is better, all things being equal.

.

Memory Card Slot. There is some similar button placement, but there have been a number of subtle improvements, and overall, build quality is better than the D If what you want is excellent quality H. Overall, I'd say the video quality is very appropriate for the price point and likely user of this camera. Yeah, the cheese keeps moving see my D review. And just to add to the mix if you put in the test prints from a M9 or M-E and M where would they fall in the print size ranking. So from my perspective, the knock at this camera is a bit of a head-scratcher. What is Micro Contrast? The D is potentially one of those cameras you buy and use for a very long time and are perfectly happy with. What Causes Card Errors? The biggest upgrade there besides to the D40 in the first place was from the Nikon D40 to the Nikon D I just got a D; too early to say much about it, but so far I like it a lot. Am I wrong on this? I looked at the reviews, including this one, of course, and the one nagging thing about it is something to do with the oil splatters from the mirror motor or something along those lines. Yesterday I bought a brand new D but honestly I found the the exposure to be not so adequate and consistent like D, especially in spot metering.