Home assistant disable integration
Speaking about disabling integrations. If I remember correctly
You either use default config, or you manage the integrations that default config provides. But, having all of my oauth callback URLs overridden is a huge hassle and while I get that it makes it easier for some users, it should be possible to opt out. I see many change Requests to have an exclude option but could not find anything in the documentation that this was solved. I dont need it, it is broken or at least not able to cope with my network infrastructure and might be the cause for my CPU Load issues. Is there an up to date list what I need to put there? The release notes will make note of this.
Home assistant disable integration
As part of a wider effort to reduce standby power usage, I have a number of devices with configured integrations which are only powered up when needed. Normally this is achieved through HA controlled smart switches. Depending on reconnection polling, these devices might be unreliably available when I want to use them with HA. If there was such a service call then I could use automations to enable them when they power up, and disable them again when they power down. I believe this would be a more valid request: detailed control of log messages. Switching off integrations to prevent a resulting action is imo not the right way froward. Absolutely, if squashing error messages is the objective then an alternative feature request of changing the Logger component level perhaps for individual components would be more appropriate. I also have that option today through configuration which is what I actually do now as a workaround. I was using the error message example as a visible indication of an issue. I have a similar issue now with my solar inverter, it switches itself off when there is nothing to invert, the integration should then handle this and not throw messages in my case this is fine and set values correct in my case the integration hangs on the last value measured … So, for me the main goal would be to address the integration. I have other examples where my tuya devices go down expectedly and I am flooded too with messages which could be handled better imo…this would still be the integration to deal with that.
Install the custom integration and in the configure options select the my component and any other component e. Scott Scott Presnell July 17,pm 1. To set up Spotify, you first need to create your own developer account.
Let me explain my use-case, since i think my use-case is generalizable. Devices like my tv, my av receiver, and my logitech harmony hub. Total power consumption is impacted a lot by doing this: a reduction of watts. You either accept warnings in the logs, or you choose not to implement energy savings in my case, i choose to accept those warnings. And i think it should be valuable to many others. By integrating this feature into Home Assistant, it would encourage more people to implement energy savings. Thereby making a positive impact on the environment.
As part of a wider effort to reduce standby power usage, I have a number of devices with configured integrations which are only powered up when needed. Normally this is achieved through HA controlled smart switches. Depending on reconnection polling, these devices might be unreliably available when I want to use them with HA. If there was such a service call then I could use automations to enable them when they power up, and disable them again when they power down. I believe this would be a more valid request: detailed control of log messages. Switching off integrations to prevent a resulting action is imo not the right way froward. Absolutely, if squashing error messages is the objective then an alternative feature request of changing the Logger component level perhaps for individual components would be more appropriate. I also have that option today through configuration which is what I actually do now as a workaround. I was using the error message example as a visible indication of an issue. I have a similar issue now with my solar inverter, it switches itself off when there is nothing to invert, the integration should then handle this and not throw messages in my case this is fine and set values correct in my case the integration hangs on the last value measured … So, for me the main goal would be to address the integration.
Home assistant disable integration
Speaking about disabling integrations. If I remember correctly I found no documentation for this. Especially if is it possible in core integrations. If so, how to disable Shelly integration? So, the integration must be added first to be disabled, right? But for Shelly. Curious if is it enough to disable it for one instance to disable whole integration? It even turned into extreme situation when I was migrating my HA.
Luke tvd
It would help if more people could chip in with their thoughts. It even turned into extreme situation when I was migrating my HA. As part of a wider effort to reduce standby power usage, I have a number of devices with configured integrations which are only powered up when needed. PrairieSnpr June 11, , pm 4. To set up Spotify, you first need to create your own developer account. This is software that provides little to no value on a system that is already configured. I also have that option today through configuration which is what I actually do now as a workaround. The reason is that while the integration is running I am unable to access the associated hardware to configure it. Scott Scott Presnell July 17, , pm 4. You can even schedule the state of this using any one of the now available scheduler options. Maybe the solution is in the integration, a service to stop and start the connection fi?
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Already on GitHub?
I have other examples where my tuya devices go down expectedly and I am flooded too with messages which could be handled better imo…this would still be the integration to deal with that. This is software that provides little to no value on a system that is already configured. Each integration controls the UI, not the front end. I understand your point. AskAlice Alice Knag May 20, , am Authorization codes are short lived and need to be swapped out for actual refresh and access tokens. No, you have to manage it yourself. So I think not. The ssdm integation enables discovery of upnp items on your network. Also fwiw, the reason that got closed is described by the developers.
This brilliant idea is necessary just by the way
Excellent idea and it is duly
Completely I share your opinion. Thought good, it agree with you.